Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix add_default_workflow #3446

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

antgonza
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@antgonza antgonza changed the title fix add_default_workflow WIP: fix add_default_workflow Dec 12, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 12, 2024

Coverage Status

coverage: 92.617% (-0.005%) from 92.622%
when pulling 843bbea on antgonza:fix-add_default_workflow
into ea0a7ec on qiita-spots:dev.

@antgonza antgonza changed the title WIP: fix add_default_workflow fix add_default_workflow Dec 16, 2024
@antgonza
Copy link
Member Author

FWIW, this was tested in qiita via a terminal and it works as expected.

Copy link
Contributor

@charles-cowart charles-cowart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ty for your patience! I have one concern.

@@ -989,7 +999,7 @@ def _get_predecessors(workflow, node):
init_artifacts = {
wkartifact_type: f'{starting_job.id}:'}
else:
init_artifacts = {wkartifact_type: self.artifact.id}
init_artifacts = {wkartifact_type: str(self.artifact.id)}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I hate to say it but having to cast an internal id to string is a little bit concerning to me. Internal code should use the numeric form of the artifact_id and it should also be easy to pass the numeric version for any REST call. May I ask why this is needed? I feel like even if it's needed, it would be much clearer to cast it right before it's used to make it obvious why it's needed. Sorry if that's not clear.

@@ -871,7 +881,7 @@ def _get_predecessors(workflow, node):
'artifact transformation']
merging_schemes = {
qdb.archive.Archive.get_merging_scheme_from_job(j): {
x: y.id for x, y in j.outputs.items()}
x: str(y.id) for x, y in j.outputs.items()}
Copy link
Contributor

@charles-cowart charles-cowart Dec 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The conversion to string for y.id is also not obvious here. Perhaps a comment as to why it's necessary would be appropriate?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants